CienciaySaludNatural.com
Dra. Mª José Martínez Albarracín
We are approaching autumn and an intensive, all inclusive, vaccination campaign is now underway. For the first time, 6 month old infants, will be inoculated throughout Spain with the anti-flu and anti-Covid vaccine, despite the fact that even the WHO has decreed the end of the emergency while as far as we know, no new clinical studies have been carried out to justify a final approval. All these, in spite only having emergency use authorization
I will not go into much detail about the failed flu vaccine, as it is obvious that no matter how much the population is vaccinated, not only does the flu not disappear but hospitalizations and deaths due to flu complications continue to increase in countries with the highest vaccinated populations. In addition, new cell culture vaccines use aborted human fetal cells for their production.
Regarding the mRNA inoculations for Covid (which I will not call vaccines because they are not), the Inter-Territory Health Council (Consejo Interterritorial de Salud) makes a series of recommendations (posted in the reference section below) where with outright impudence, say that the “new adapted vaccines” are preferred but if these are not available, then the old stocks which no longer have anything to do with the new variants that supposedly circulate will be used: the point is to vaccinate, vaccinate and vaccinate…
I leave for another occasion my comments on the new RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) or RNA replicase enzyme shots. These self-amplifying mRNA “vaccines” use a synthetic RNA that will multiply on its own in the inoculated thanks to the addition of this replicase enzyme of viral origin. In this manner, with less investment by the industry, multivalent “vaccines” will be obtained. New “vaccines” for all new “germs” for everyone, despite the fact that this technology is not only incapable of immunization but also produces serious health problems.
Among the health problems caused by mRNA inoculations (of which, we have been warning since 2021), a recent publication in the medical journal, Nature, lists: risk of death, lung diseases and diabetes, as well as chronic fatigue or long Covid. While it refers to the risks after the viral infection and the first 2 years after infection, it conveniently “forgets” to mention that it is after the viral infection suffered after getting the “vaccine”.
The question that begs is, “how can we know that the serious health problems are due to the vaccine and not to the SARS-CoV-2 infection?” Well, fortunately, we can now easily answer it with irrefutable proof.
Todate, the research of German pathologists Arne Burkhardt and Michael Mörz, who, through immuno-histochemical staining methods, found the spike protein in lesions from autopsies and biopsies, but there was still the possibility that this protein could be of viral origin and not from the vaccines.
However, a new Italian study by Brogna et al., “Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: Possible molecular mechanisms”leaves no room for doubt.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048
Using liquid chromatography associated with mass spectrometry (in bold to highlight that mass spectrometry is an IDENTIFICATION technique with superior and indisputable analytical range – what is detected is unequivocal and only this is identified). The researchers analyzed blood from the vaccinated but added 2 more control groups, using blood from unvaccinated/ uninfected and blood from unvaccinated/Covid infected.
The blood samples analyzed looked only for vaccine spike proteins so as not to be confused with the SARS-CoV-2 spike. They cut the protein into fragments using trypsin digestion looking for a specific mass fragment that can only be present in the recombinant spike of the vaccine: Adding two prolines to stabilize the protein in a prefusion state and make it more antigenic, the researchers call it the PP Spike Protein
The results of the study are conclusive: ONLY IN THE VACCINATED is this fragment found. Fortunately, these fragments appeared in only half of the vaccinated but the bad news is that these persisted over a range of between 69 and 187 days after inoculation. Unfortunately this study has not been extended to determine how much longer beyond these first 6 months do the vaccinated continue manifesting these fragments, i.e. when does the spike protein manufacture stop?
What does this mean? No more and no less than half of those inoculated are producing the synthetic spike protein in their bodies in a persistent manner. Take this fact to explain that a very toxic, thrombogenic, prionic and carcinogenic protein, would account for the serious health problems experienced by many of the inoculated, including sudden deaths. I dare question, how long after inoculation, 2 years?
Among the explanations the authors offer for this persistence of the vaccine spike, the most fearsome is that it is possible that the mRNA is integrated or retro transcribed in some cells. The so-called «reverse transcription», that is, that the mRNA of the vaccine becomes part of the human DNA genome in some affected cells, a hypothesis originally ruled out without proof by the so-called «COVID science», until demonstrated by in vitro experiments
If so, there is a disturbing possibility that COVID spike protein production may never end.
On the other hand, the SV40 viral promoter found in large quantities in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines could be facilitating this genomic integration, which would explain that only those inoculated with these “vaccines” were the ones that produced a persistent spike.
I do not want to end this article without offering hope to those vaccinated, because fortunately protocols have been developed to counteract this production of toxic protein and among them, one of the simplest is the one developed by cardiologist Peter McCullough that I leave in the references and which consists of the administration of:
-Nattokinase 2000 FU (100) mg orally twice a day without food.
-Bromelain 500 mg orally once a day without food.
-Curcumin 500 mg orally twice a day (nano, liposomal or with piperine additive suggested) Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, Cade Wynn, Brian C. Procter, MD https://zenodo.org/record/8286460
REFERENCES:
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-clinical-rationale-for-sars
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/experts-issue-urgent-death-warning-30775266.amp
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/sv40-promoter-in-covid-injections
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, Cade Wynn, Brian C. Procter, MD https://zenodo.org/record/8286460
